kalogb.co.uk
Mechanic inspecting an engine

Reliability report

Peugeot Boxer reliability and common faults

Based on 56,579 roadworthiness tests, led by the UK MOT. Each country is compared only with its own average for cars of the same age.

Peugeot Boxer — model photo
Photo: Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · MOT

23.0%

fail rate · average 27.2%

much better than average

51,358 MOT tests (DVSA)

🇳🇱 Netherlands · APK

47.2%

with defects · average 40.3%

much worse than average

3,033 APK inspections (RDW)

🇱🇹 Lithuania · inspection

44.5%

first-time pass · average 49.2%

worse than average

2,188 inspections

Testing regimes differ from country to country – don’t compare the figures between countries; compare each one only with its own average. MOT data: contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Weak spots

What goes wrong on the Peugeot Boxer

How often each area fails compared with the average car of the same age (vertical line = average, 100%). Red – more often than average.

Body and structure

🇬🇧
102%
🇳🇱
462%

Driving controls

🇬🇧
334%
🇳🇱no data

Seat belts and airbagsconfirmed in 2 countries

🇬🇧
107%
🇳🇱
290%

Visibilityconfirmed in 2 countries

🇬🇧
106%
🇳🇱
167%

Suspension

🇬🇧
65%
🇳🇱
153%

Steering

🇬🇧
48%
🇳🇱
151%

Brakesconfirmed in 2 countries

🇬🇧
105%
🇳🇱
149%

Exhaust and emissions

🇬🇧
62%
🇳🇱
145%

Lights and electrics

🇬🇧
95%
🇳🇱
138%

Plates and identification

🇬🇧
55%
🇳🇱
134%

Wheels

🇬🇧
19%
🇳🇱
125%

Tyres

🇬🇧
39%
🇳🇱
76%

Most common test failures

  1. 1Tyre pressure not at correct value
  2. 2Low beam incorrectly adjusted
  3. 3Excessive leakage of other fluids
  4. 4Windscreen wiper system gives insufficient visibility
  5. 5Airbag / seatbelt system warning light indicates a fault
  6. 6Tyre insufficient tread
  7. 7Tyre(s) with tread depth of 1.6 to 2.5 mm
  8. 8Low beam / high beam doesn't work (properly)
  9. 9Rust damage of 1.5 to 2.0E or more than 15% thickness loss
  10. 10Mechanical parts of the brake system show wear
  11. 11Tyre damaged

Results by vehicle age

Age🇬🇧 MOT fail rate🇳🇱 APK defects
3–5 years10.7% avg 9.9%40.9% avg 27.0%
6–8 years14.2% avg 15.3%43.3% avg 36.7%
9–11 years17.9% avg 22.9%49.8% avg 44.4%
12–15 years18.2% avg 30.3%—
16–20 years25.7% avg 34.6%—
21+ years34.6% avg 31.4%68.9% avg 68.4%

🇱🇹 First-time pass rate in Lithuania – by year of manufacture

YearBoxerAverage for yearInspections
201866.0%79.5%97
201564.5%71.1%31
201352.9%65.9%34
201250.9%63.7%55
201150.6%61.2%81
201045.7%57.3%81
200950.0%54.5%70
200837.6%52.4%125
200752.9%50.6%170
200644.1%48.7%143
200538.3%46.6%175
200437.2%44.5%191
200342.6%42.9%115
200237.5%42.0%176
200143.0%40.9%107

Peugeot Boxer – FAQs

How reliable is the Peugeot Boxer?+

In the UK the Peugeot Boxer fails 23.0% of MOT tests, against an average of 27.2% for cars of the same age – much better than average. In the Netherlands, inspectors found defects at 47.2% of APK inspections (average there 40.3%) – much worse than average. In Lithuania 44.5% pass their roadworthiness test first time (average for those years there 49.2%) – worse than average.

What goes wrong most often on the Peugeot Boxer?+

Compared with the average car of the same age, testers find faults more often in these areas: body and structure, seat belts and airbags, visibility, suspension.

What should I check when buying a used Peugeot Boxer?+

The most common inspection failures: Tyre pressure not at correct value; Low beam incorrectly adjusted; Excessive leakage of other fluids; Windscreen wiper system gives insufficient visibility; Airbag / seatbelt system warning light indicates a fault. Before you buy, also check the free MOT history on GOV.UK and the car’s history by reg or VIN (mileage, damage, theft).

More Peugeot models

Sources: anonymised MOT test results (DVSA) – contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; APK inspection defects (RDW, open data); Lithuanian roadworthiness test results (data.gov.lt). Initial tests only; retests are not counted. Photo: Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons (licence).