kalogb.co.uk
Mechanic inspecting an engine

Reliability report

Volvo 900 reliability and common faults

Based on 2,762 roadworthiness tests, led by the UK MOT. Each country is compared only with its own average for cars of the same age.

Volvo 900 — model photo
Photo: Rudolf Stricker, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

🇬🇧 United Kingdom · MOT

29.6%

fail rate · average 31.4%

better than average

2,762 MOT tests (DVSA)

Testing regimes differ from country to country – don’t compare the figures between countries; compare each one only with its own average. MOT data: contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Weak spots

What goes wrong on the Volvo 900

How often each area fails compared with the average car of the same age (vertical line = average, 100%). Red – more often than average.

Driving controls

🇬🇧
815%

Plates and identification

🇬🇧
170%

Exhaust and emissions

🇬🇧
130%

Tyres

🇬🇧
107%

Steering

🇬🇧
107%

Body and structure

🇬🇧
106%

Brakes

🇬🇧
95%

Lights and electrics

🇬🇧
86%

Visibility

🇬🇧
84%

Wheels

🇬🇧
83%

Seat belts and airbags

🇬🇧
79%

Suspension

🇬🇧
77%

Results by vehicle age

Age🇬🇧 MOT fail rate🇳🇱 APK defects
21+ years29.6% avg 31.4%—

Volvo 900 – FAQs

How reliable is the Volvo 900?+

In the UK the Volvo 900 fails 29.6% of MOT tests, against an average of 31.4% for cars of the same age – better than average.

What goes wrong most often on the Volvo 900?+

Compared with the average car of the same age, testers find faults more often in these areas: plates and identification, exhaust and emissions.

More Volvo models

Sources: anonymised MOT test results (DVSA) – contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; APK inspection defects (RDW, open data); Lithuanian roadworthiness test results (data.gov.lt). Initial tests only; retests are not counted. Photo: Rudolf Stricker, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons (licence).